How We Work
Hourly engagements, senior engineers, and no big-bang cutovers.
Hourly, and only hourly
Every engagement is time and materials: senior US engineers billed by the hour, either as a scoped project or as staff augmentation inside your team. Scope, staffing, and timeline are agreed through an initial conversation. We do not sell fixed-price packages, and we do not publish rates — integration work priced before the estate is understood is guesswork dressed as certainty.
Senior engineers, no bait and switch
The people who scope your work are the people who do it. We staff engagements with senior engineers who have run Camel in production, and we keep teams small enough that everyone on them is someone you would want in your design reviews.
Patterns first
We work from the enterprise integration patterns — the shared vocabulary of the field — because named, well-understood patterns are what make an integration layer maintainable by people who did not write it. When your problem does not fit a pattern, we say so and design deliberately, rather than forcing the fit.
Everything written down
Reviews end in written findings. Builds end in documentation and tests. Incidents end in post-incident analyses. If it matters, it is in a document your team keeps — our goal is that you understand your estate better after every engagement, whether or not we are in the next one.
Reversible moves
Migrations run in parallel with reconciliation before any cutover; upgrades roll out in slices; cutovers keep a live path back. We structure work so that no single step is a leap of faith, because integration layers are where a leap of faith costs the most.
Honest scoping
If a review can be done in a week, we will not propose a month. If plain Kafka consumers fit your problem better than Camel does, we will tell you — we have written about exactly that. The engagements that come back are the ones scoped honestly the first time.